BERTRAND v. TEDESCO (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Julianna BERTRAND, Petitioner, v. Gina TEDESCO, Respondent.

No. 2D2026-0731

Decided: September 18, 2026

Julianna Bertrand, pro se. Peter J. Pike of Pike Law Firm, P.A., Bradenton, for Respondent.

The portion of Petitioner's petition for writ of certiorari seeking relief from the trial court's March 10, 2026, order is dismissed. See Hutchins v. SCT Trading, LLC, 392 So. 3d 246, 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024). The portion seeking relief from the trial court's March 19, 2026, order is denied. See Silvers v. Silvers, 504 So. 2d 30, 31 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Petitioner's alternative petitions for mandamus and prohibition are denied. See Mathews v. Crews, 132 So. 3d 776, 778 (Fla. 2014); English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293, 296–97 (Fla. 1977). Respondent's request for sanctions is denied. Cf. Jarrette Bay Invs. Corp. v. BankUnited, N.A., 207 So. 3d 345, 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

PER CURIAM.

KELLY, BLACK, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network