LLC v. Intercounty Engineering, Inc., Arch Insurance Company, and The Gray Insurance Company, Appellees. (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Grovin Farms, LLC, Appellant, v. Intercounty Engineering, Inc., Arch Insurance Company, and The Gray Insurance Company, Appellees.

Case No. 5D2025-2863

Decided: September 04, 2026

Grant Van Aman, of Van Aman Law, PLLC, Tampa, for Appellant. Mike Piscitelli, Joseph W. Lawrence, II, and Christina Strandell, of VLP Copenhaver Espino, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellees Intercounty Engineering, Inc. and Arch Insurance Company. No Appearance for Remaining Appellee.

Affirmed. See Bolick v. Sperry, 82 So. 2d 374, 376 (Fla. 1955) (“Under our system of procedure the burden is always upon the appellant to make reversible error clearly appear.”); Ford Motor Co. v. Hetsler, No. 5D2024-2368, 15 Fla. L. Weekly D1582b, 2026 WL 2207050, at *8 (Fla. 5th DCA July 31, 2026) (“To carry its burden, an appellant must, at a minimum, adequately brief the important issues along the decisional path so the court is not left to do the lion's share of the work․ If the gaps left by an initial brief would require the court to rebrief the appeal, the argument is insufficient, and we will affirm on that basis.” (citation modified)).

Per Curiam.

Jay, C.J., and Eisnaugle and Soud, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network