KEEPERMAN v. ZM MWC OWNER LLC (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Luiz KEEPERMAN, Appellant, v. ZM MWC OWNER, LLC, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D26-1111

Decided: August 19, 2026

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

Luiz Keeperman, in proper person. Barfield McCain Ayoub, P.A., and Elizabeth S. Rivera (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

Having reviewed the initial brief, the record, and the order under review, and finding no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated, we summarily affirm. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a); Fla. Detroit Diesel v. Nathai, 28 So. 3d 182, 184 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“We have elected to review the order under the summary disposition procedure in rule 9.315(a) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. This rule authorizes an appellate court to summarily affirm an order of the lower tribunal if ‘no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated.’ ”).

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network