Helena Rena Billingsly, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2026)

Appellant's probation was revoked based upon her admitting to several charged violations. The trial court accepted her admission, revoked her probation, imposed a legal sentence, and ordered her to pay certain outstanding fines and court costs. There was no error in any aspect of that; therefore, we affirm.  ¹ However, the written order revoking probation failed to identify the conditions of probation that she admitted to violating and failed to identify the conditions of probation that Appellant was found to have violated. Accordingly, we remand to the lower tribunal for entry of an amended written order of revocation which sets forth the conditions of probation that Appellant violated. See Hurta v. State, 403 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025) (citing Bride v. State, 391 So. 3d 515 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024)).

Affirmed; Remanded.

FOOTNOTES

1.   This is an Anders appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our review is in accordance with State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1987).

Per Curiam.

Makar, Edwards, and Harris, JJ., concur.