Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Anna Puett, Appellant, v. Florida Oranges, LLC d/b/a Howey Mansion, LLC d/b/a The Howey Mansion, and Blush by Brandee Gaar, LLC, Appellees.
This consolidated appeal involves Case Nos. 5D2025-1149, 5D2025-1766, and 5D2025-1892, all of which arose from the same premises liability claim. The trial court granted summary judgment for Howey Mansion, LLC, (“Howey Mansion”), and Blush by Brandee Gaar, LLC, (“Blush”). But it denied Howey Mansion's request for attorney's fees and costs.
We affirm all the trial court's rulings, save one. Specifically, we affirm the summary judgments for Howey Mansion and Blush. We also affirm the denial of Howey Mansion's motion for attorney's fees. But we reverse the denial of Howey Mansion's motion for costs under section 57.041, Florida Statutes.
As to the summary judgments, the trial judge correctly entered the judgments because the evidence was “so one-sided” that Howey Mansion and Blush were entitled to “prevail as a matter of law.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 252 (1986). Likewise, the trial court rightly denied Howey Mansion's motion for attorney's fees under its joint proposal of settlement with Florida Oranges because only one of the joint offerors obtained a judgment and because the joint proposal required Puett to settle with both offerors.
However, we reverse the trial court's denial of costs to Howey Mansion. Section 57.041(1) provides that the “party recovering judgment shall recover all his or her legal costs and charges.” (emphasis added). The statutory language is “unambiguous.” Hendry Tractor Co. v. Fernandez, 432 So. 2d 1315, 1316 (Fla. 1983). Meaning, the statute “demands that the party recovering judgment be awarded costs.” Id. Howey Mansion recovered judgment. It's entitled to lawful costs. See Porath v. Nugent, 408 So. 3d 783, 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) (“Where costs are sought based on section 57.041(1), a trial court has no discretion to deny the party obtaining judgment its lawful costs.” (quoting Roberts v. Third Palm, LLC, 300 So. 3d 1216, 1217 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020))).
Affirmed in part; and Reversed in part; and Remanded.
Per Curiam.
Jay, C.J., and Edwards and Harris, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Case Nos. 5D2025-1149, 5D2025-1766, 5D2025-1892
Decided: August 07, 2026
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)