Darrell Sanders, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Darrell Sanders, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D22-1470

Decided: July 16, 2026

Before SCALES, C.J., and LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.

Rasco Klock, and Joseph P. Klock, Jr., for appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Affirmed. See D.G. v. State, 315 So. 3d 72, 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (“The trial court's finding of a willful and substantial violation of probation term is reviewed for competent, substantial evidence. The trial court's decision to revoke probation based on such evidence is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”) (citation omitted); Savage v. State, 120 So. 3d 619, 621 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (“[W]e first assess whether the finding of a willful and substantial [probation] violation is supported by competent substantial evidence.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network