Randolph Baggett, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee. (2023)

Affirmed. See Baggett v. Inch, 349 So. 3d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021); Baggett v. State, 271 So. 3d 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); Baggett v. State, 150 So. 3d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287, 290-91 (Fla. 2003) (holding that although res judicata does not prevent a defendant from filing successive 3.800 motions raising new issues, collateral estoppel prevents a defendant from relitigating issues previously presented and decided). See also Franklin v. State, 258 So. 3d 1239, 1241 (Fla. 2018) (acknowledging that in State v. Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018), the Florida Supreme Court abrogated Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016): “As we held in Michel, involving a juvenile homicide offender sentenced to life with the possibility of parole after 25 years, Florida's statutory parole process fulfills Graham's requirement that juveniles be given a “meaningful opportunity” to be considered for release during their natural life based upon “normal parole factors,” [Virginia v.] LeBlanc, 137 S.Ct. [1726,] 1729 (2017), as it includes initial and subsequent parole reviews based upon individualized considerations before the Florida Parole Commission that are subject to judicial review. ․”)

PER CURIAM.