ALFARO v. MARRERO (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Javier ALFARO, et al., Appellants, v. Omar MARRERO, Appellee.

No. 3D24-1879

Decided: July 15, 2026

Before SCALES, C.J., and LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.

Carlton Fields, P.A., and Dean A. Morande, (West Palm Beach), for appellants. Morgan & Morgan, and Grant R. Gillenwater (Melbourne), and David L. Luck, and Marisa K. Glassman, for appellee.

Appellants, Javier Alfaro and Xtreme Creative Builders, Inc., appeal a final order entered after a jury verdict in favor of Appellee, Omar Marrero, and an order denying Alfaro's motion for a new trial and remittitur. We affirm. See Tundidor v. State, 221 So. 3d 587, 603 (Fla. 2017) (quoting Stephens v. State, 787 So. 2d 747, 754 (Fla. 2001)) (“A trial court's denial of a motion for a new trial is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard․ To demonstrate abuse, the nonprevailing party must establish that no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court.”).

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network