FREEMAN v. STATE (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Antoine FREEMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D21-1149

Decided: July 20, 2022

Before LINDSEY, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Maria E. Lauredo, Chief Assistant Public Defender and Deborah Prager, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Schmidt v. State, 310 So. 3d 135, 137 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (“The statute [section 948.06(2)(f)1.c.] thus limits the probationers eligible for sentencing under the statute to probationers with only one technical violation. And so, we conclude that the plain language of the statute conveys a clear and definite meaning to exclude from its applications probationers who have more than one low-risk technical violation.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network