RICARDO AIZENMAN v. NIZA ARAKANJI (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

RICARDO AIZENMAN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. NIZA ARAKANJI, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D22-1383

Decided: October 10, 2022

The Court grants Petitioner's September 15, 2022, Motion to File Late Reply, vacates this Court's September 15, 2022, Order, and deems Petitioner's Reply as timely filed.

After careful consideration of the Petition for Writ of Prohibition, the Response, the Reply, and the Appendices, the Court again denies Petitioner's Petition seeking a writ prohibiting the trial court from continuing to adjudicate matters in this case.

Upon consideration, the Court denies Petitioner's Motion for Appellate Attorney's Fees and Costs, and remands Respondent's Motion for Appellate Attorney's Fees and Costs to the trial court to make the appropriate determinations pursuant to Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997), and section 61.16, Florida Statutes.

SCALES, MILLER and GORDO, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law