ALEXANDER ACKERMAN v. YURIKO YISSEL DE LA BARRA (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

ALEXANDER ACKERMAN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. YURIKO YISSEL DE LA BARRA, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D22-1367

Decided: September 21, 2022

Following review of the Petition for Writ of Prohibition, and the Response and Reply thereto, it is ordered that said Petition is hereby denied without prejudice to the filing of a petition for writ of mandamus.

Upon consideration, Respondent's “Motion for Entitlement for Attorney's Fees” is remanded to the trial court. If the movant establishes entitlement pursuant to section 61.16, Florida Statutes, and Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997), the trial court is authorized to award the movant all, or a portion of, the reasonable appellate attorney's fees.

SCALES, MILLER and GORDO, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network