SUZANNE WITROCK v. JASON WITROCK (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SUZANNE WITROCK, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. JASON WITROCK, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D22-1766

Decided: November 30, 2022

Following review of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus or, in the Alternative, for Writ of Certiorari, and the Response thereto, it is ordered that said Petition is hereby denied.

The parties’ Motions for Appellate Attorney's Fees are hereby remanded to the trial court. If the movant establishes his or her entitlement pursuant to section 61.16, Florida Statutes, and Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997), the trial court is authorized to award the movant all, or a portion of, the reasonable appellate attorney's fees.

cc: Amanda B. Haberman Robert F. Kohlman-Morales Hon. Migna Sanchez-Llorens

Daniel Kaplan

Hon. Maria Elena Verde

Liliana Loebl

Miami-Dade Clerk

LINDSEY, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network