Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JOSEPH ANSAROFF, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. MARIA THERESA LAURELES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),
Appellants’ Response to the Motion to Dismiss Appeal is noted.
Upon consideration, the Court grants Appellee Maria Theresa Laureles's Motion to Dismiss Appeal, and hereby dismisses this appeal as one taken from a non-final, non-appealable order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(h)(2) (a timely and authorized motion for rehearing tolls rendition and “the final order shall not be deemed rendered. . . until all of the motions are either withdrawn by written notice filed in the lower tribunal or resolved by the rendition of an order disposing of the last of such motions.”); M & M Aircraft Svcs., Inc., v. J.D. Valenciana de Aviacion, Inc., 644 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Carbajal v. De La Caridad Paz, 719 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CASE NO.: 3D22-1863
Decided: December 08, 2022
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)