5725 LAGORCE PARTNERS LLC v. 5AIF MAPLE LLC (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

5725 LAGORCE PARTNERS, LLC, Appellant, v. 5AIF MAPLE 2 LLC, Appellee.

No. 3D21-1756

Decided: May 25, 2022

Before EMAS, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.

Marrero, Chamizo, Marcer Law, LP, and Julio C. Marrero, for appellant. John L. Penson, P.A., and John L. Penson, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Tanis v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 289 So. 3d 517, 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“ ‘[I]t is essential that no sale be set aside for trifling reasons, or on account of matters which ought to have been attended to by the complaining party prior thereto,’ as appellants were apprised of the pendency of the action, thus afforded an opportunity to object, we ascertain no abuse of discretion in the ruling of the trial court”) (quoting Pewabic Mining Co. v. Mason, 145 U.S. 349, 356, 12 S.Ct. 887, 36 L.Ed. 732 (1892)). See also Volynsky v. Park Tree Invs. 21, LLC, 322 So. 3d 714, 716 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (“[T]he trial court afforded Volynsky both notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard, satisfying the essential elements of due process”) (citing § 45.031(8), Fla. Stat. (2021)).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network