ESTIME v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Limoine J. ESTIME, Jr., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and Carla Beatriz Guzman Maldonado, Appellees.

No. 4D21-2508

Decided: April 27, 2022

Limoine J. Estime, Jr., West Palm Beach, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Appellant Limoine Estime, Jr. appeals the Department of Revenue's final administrative paternity and support order. As his arguments on appeal were not preserved below, we affirm.

As in Lozano v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement, 311 So. 3d 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021), our affirmance is “without prejudice for the appellant to seek a modification of the final administrative support order as set forth in section 409.2563(12), Florida Statutes (2020), or a superseding order in the circuit court pursuant to section 409.2563(10)(c), Florida Statutes (2020).” Id.

Affirmed without prejudice.

Per Curiam.

Conner, C.J., Forst and Artau, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network