Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ORTHOPEDIC & SPINE INJURIES, LLC, a/a/o Giannina Barrantes, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
The plaintiff appeals from the county court's final order sua sponte dismissing its action for unpaid PIP benefits. The court entered the dismissal order on the basis that the plaintiff failed to comply with the court's previous order giving the plaintiff a certain time period to file a motion for summary judgment. Notably, the court required the plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment despite both parties requesting a jury trial on the disputed issue of whether the plaintiff's services were medically necessary and/or related to the automobile accident. The defendant has filed a confession of error on the basis that the court: (1) failed to give the plaintiff notice or the opportunity to be heard before dismissing the action; and (2) improperly required the submission of a motion for summary judgment when both parties had requested a jury trial. We accept the defendant's confession of error. See Comprehensive Spine Ctr., PLLC v. Equity Ins. Co., 330 So. 3d 35, 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (“Due process requires notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to dismissal.” (quoting Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Sanchez, 187 So. 3d 341, 342 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016))); Derius v. Allstate Indem. Co., 723 So. 2d 271, 274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (“Whether a given medical service is ‘necessary’ under [Florida's PIP statute] is a question of fact for the jury.”). Based on the foregoing, we reverse the final order of dismissal and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded.
Per Curiam.
Warner, Gross and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D21-3200
Decided: April 20, 2022
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)