LARSON v. FC OYSTER HARBOR LLC GBH LLC (2022)

Dismissed. See Senior Care Grp., Inc. v. Est. of Fischer ex rel. Woodworth, 12 So. 3d 766, 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (dismissing a petition for writ of certiorari as premature where a party was merely compelled “to produce certain documents to the trial court for an in camera inspection”); Gross v. Am. Federated Title Corp., 314 So. 3d 575, 576-77 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (recognizing that certiorari review of “an order requiring allegedly privileged documents to be assembled and submitted for an in camera inspection ․ is premature because no irreparable harm can be demonstrated until the court enters a subsequent order actually requiring the production of the privileged documents” (citing Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. Rodriguez, 2 So. 3d 1027, 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009))); Cape Canaveral Hosp., Inc. v. Leal, 917 So. 2d 336, 340 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (determining that a petition for a writ of certiorari was premature because no irreparable harm had been demonstrated when a party was “merely require[d] ․ to produce the requested documents for an in camera inspection by the trial court”).

PER CURIAM.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and STARGEL, JJ., Concur.