Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kyle Lee CHAMBERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Kyle Chambers appeals the trial court's order denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Chambers pleaded guilty to burglary of a dwelling and possession of burglary tools. Chambers argues that he was not informed of a possible defense and that his plea was involuntary. We affirm.
A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel must establish both deficient performance and prejudice. In a case like this, where Chambers entered a plea, the prejudice prong requires showing “a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, the defendant would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985). The Florida Supreme Court has explained that
a court should consider the totality of the circumstances surrounding the plea, including such factors as whether a particular defense was likely to succeed at trial, the colloquy between the defendant and the trial court at the time of the plea, and the difference between the sentence imposed under the plea and the maximum possible sentence the defendant faced at trial.
Grosvenor v. State, 874 So. 2d 1176, 1181 (Fla. 2004).
Here, the trial court determined that trial defense counsel's testimony that Chambers had been advised of the defense was credible. A trial court “may consider a trial attorney's general practice as evidence when making a factual finding about specific conversations between the attorney and client.” Morales v. State, 308 So. 3d 1093, 1098 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020). That determination was based on competent, substantial evidence. “Where the postconviction court's factual findings and credibility determinations are supported by competent, substantial evidence, this Court will defer to its findings because the postconviction court has a superior vantage point in assessing the credibility of witnesses and in making findings of fact.” Moore v. State, 132 So. 3d 718, 727 (Fla. 2013) (quotations omitted).
Affirmed.
Long, J.
Makar and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D21-0990
Decided: March 30, 2022
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)