CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION v. ESPINOSA (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Carlos ESPINOSA and Yanik Fenton, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D21-1673

Decided: December 03, 2021

Following review of the Petition for Writ of Certiorari, and the Response and Reply thereto, it is ordered that said Petition is hereby denied.

Upon consideration of Respondents’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, it is ordered that said Motion is conditionally granted, contingent upon Respondents ultimately prevailing below.

Petitioner's Motion for Appellate Attorneys’ Fees is hereby denied.

HENDON, MILLER and GORDO, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network