COLLINS v. BATES (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Philip David Charles COLLINS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Orianne BATES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D21-2114

Decided: January 25, 2022

Following review of the Petition for Writ of Prohibition, the Response and Reply thereto, as well as the Motion to Dismiss and the Response to said Motion, it is ordered that the Petition is hereby denied. See Mandico v. Taos Const., Inc., 605 So. 2d 850, 854 (Fla. 1992) (Prohibition “is very narrow in scope and operation and must be employed with caution and utilized only in emergency cases to prevent an impending injury where there is no other appropriate and adequate legal remedy.”); S. Recs. & Tape Serv. v. Goldman, 502 So. 2d 413, 414 (Fla. 1986) (“Prohibition is not a writ of right, but, rather, is a discretionary writ.”).

LOGUE, LINDSEY and HENDON, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network