HARRELL v. LYFT (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

David HARRELL, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. LYFT, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D21-2152

Decided: March 04, 2022

After careful review, Appellee Lyft, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal is granted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed as one taken from a non-final, non-appealable order.

Pro se Appellant may, as appropriate, appeal after the rendition of a final, or otherwise appealable, order.

Because the Court dismisses the appeal, pro se Appellant's “Motion to Compel/Clarify Trial Court to Issue Final Appealable Order to Appellant” is hereby denied as moot.

EMAS, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network