Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Eric SPIVEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Upon consideration of Appellant's Motion for Rehearing, we grant rehearing and withdraw the opinion of January 26, 2022, consider Appellant's timely filed initial brief and substitute the following opinion in its place.
Affirmed. See Cregg v. State, 43 So. 3d 818, 821 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“When a consecutive sentence is pronounced, the defendant is not entitled to credit for time served on an antecedent sentence.” (citing Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543, 545 (Fla.1986))).
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D21-1647
Decided: March 02, 2022
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)