GRANVILLE v. STATE (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Shane GRANVILLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D20-3333

Decided: December 29, 2021

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Shane Granville, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Appellant challenges a final order revoking community control and sentencing him to twenty years of imprisonment. Appointed counsel is unable to argue reversible error occurred below. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The arguments raised by Appellant in his pro se brief are without merit. We affirm the revocation and sentence, but upon suggestion of appointed counsel and confirmed by our independent review of the record, remand is required for entry of a corrected revocation order. The order entered states that Appellant violated three conditions of his community control. However, in its oral findings, the trial court found only one violation: failure to complete sex offender treatment (condition 18). Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to correct the scrivener's error.

Affirmed and Remanded for entry of a corrected order.

Per Curiam.

Roberts, Ray, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network