JPMORGAN CHASE BANK v. LLOVET (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellant, v. Jorge LLOVET, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D19-1252

Decided: December 22, 2021

Before EMAS, LOGUE and HENDON, JJ.

León Cosgrove, LLP, and Derek E. León, Andrew B. Boese, and John R. Byrne, for appellant. Jacobs Legal, PLLC, and Bruce Jacobs, for appellee Jorge Llovet.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., a non-party to the litigation below, seeks review of the denial of its motion for a protective order from post-judgment discovery pursuant to a subpoena. In a companion proceeding before this Court, stemming from the same case, and involving the same parties, lawyers, and issue, but a different subpoena, we reversed an order denying JPMorgan Chase's motion for a protective order since “Llovet is barred from re-opening discovery post-judgment because the discovery he now seeks could have been requested pre-judgment.” JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Llovet, No. 3D19-1118, 330 So.3d 1006, 1010 (Fla. 3d DCA Nov. 17, 2021). For the same reason, we reverse the order under review and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network