J.S., the Father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

J.S., the Father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem, Appellees.

No. 4D21-1923

Decided: December 01, 2021

Thomas J. Butler of Thomas Butler, P.A., Miami Beach, for appellant. Andrew Feigenbaum, Appellate Counsel, Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach, and Logan Bartholomew, Certified Legal Intern, Florida A&M University College of Law, Orlando, for appellee Department of Children and Families. Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd Weitz, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad Litem o/b/o J.N., J.S. & J.S.

Affirmed.

The trial court terminated the father's rights to his sons, finding that DCF had established grounds for termination under section 39.806(1)(f) and (g), Florida Statutes (2020). I would hold that termination pursuant to section 39.806(1)(g) was not supported by the evidence. See A.J. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams., 97 So. 3d 985 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). I would also hold that section 39.806(1)(f) is unconstitutional because it requires no proof of a nexus between the egregious conduct towards one child and the potential harm to the child's siblings in order to terminate the parental rights to the child's siblings. See V.S. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams., 322 So. 3d 1153 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (Warner, J., dissenting).

Per Curiam.

Gerber and Levine, JJ., concur. Warner, J., dissents with opinion.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network