CHERFRERE v. STATE (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Morin CHERFRERE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-2065

Decided: November 24, 2021

Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

McLain Law, P.A., and Matthew R. McLain (Longwood), for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Hernandez v. State, 325 So.3d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“The trial court's findings of fact on the statutory factors listed in [section 921.1402] are reviewed for the existence of competent, substantial evidence in the record.”); Bell v. State, 313 So. 3d 1183, 1187 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (“On appeal, any factual findings by the trial court which are supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record must be affirmed, and the court's ultimate sentencing decision is reviewed for abuse of discretion.” (citing Jackson v. State, 276 So. 3d 73, 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019))).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network