CUTLER BAY MEDICAL SERVICES INC v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

CUTLER BAY MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., etc., Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 3D21-145

Decided: November 17, 2021

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS and BOKOR, JJ.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Corredor & Husseini, P.A., and Maria E. Corredor, for appellant. Birnbaum, Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, and Nancy W. Gregoire Stamper (Fort Lauderdale); Kirwan Spellacy Danner Watkins & Brownstein, P.A., and Christopher L. Kirwan and R. Ryan Smith (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Affirmed. Brown v. Estate of Stuckey, 749 So. 2d 490, 498 (Fla. 1999) (“If an appellate court determines that reasonable persons could differ as to the propriety of the action taken by the trial court, there can be no finding of an abuse of discretion.”); see also Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Ledoux, 230 So. 3d 530, 537-38 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (finding no abuse of discretion and affirming the denial of motions for mistrial and for new trial based on both preserved and unpreserved objections).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network