RAMOS v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nelson C. RAMOS, et al., Appellants, v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 3D20-1910

Decided: October 27, 2021

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ.

Shield Law Group of Florida, LLC, and Jamie Alvarez, Jesse Peterson, Jonathan Chriqui and Clement Dean (Davie), for appellants. Kelley Kronenberg, P.A., and Kimberly J. Fernandes (Tallahassee), for appellee.

Affirmed. See The Fla. Bar v. Greene, 926 So. 2d 1195, 1200 (Fla. 2006) (“Summary judgment is designed to test the sufficiency of the evidence to determine if there is sufficient evidence at issue to justify a trial or formal hearing on the issues raised in the pleadings.”); Gonzalez v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 273 So. 3d 1031, 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“[T]he affidavits opposing summary judgment must identify admissible evidence that creates a genuine issue of material fact.”) (quotations omitted), review denied, No. SC19-990, 2019 WL 6249341 (Fla. Nov. 22, 2019).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network