Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CITY OF MIAMI, Petitioner/Appellant, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Respondent/Appellee.
In this case, the City appealed an emergency preliminary injunction order entered by the trial court after a March 7, 2021 emergency hearing (case number 3D21-761). The City separately filed a petition in this Court seeking alternate remedies of prohibition and mandamus (case number 3D21-701). We consolidated the cases. We affirm the trial court's temporary injunction, but grant the City's petition and remand with instructions for the trial court, pursuant to section 164.1041(1) of the Florida Statutes, to abate further proceedings until the procedural options of chapter 164 have been exhausted. The controlling case of City of Miami v. Firefighters' & Police Officers' Retirement Trust & Plan, 249 So. 3d 709 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018), provides as follows:
The only reasonable construction of [section 164.1041(1)] requires the trial court to abate the proceedings until the parties exhaust the procedural options of Chapter 164, even if dispute resolution procedures were not initiated prior to filing suit․
Any other reading would produce absurd results, would permit parties to evade conflict resolution in favor of litigation, frustrating the entire legislative purpose and intent of chapter 164.
City of Miami, 249 So. 3d at 716-17 (remanding case to the trial court to enter temporary injunction coincident with holding, in the same opinion, that the trial court had erred by denying motion to abate as required by section 164.1041(1)).
Preliminary injunction affirmed; petition granted; case remanded with abatement instruction.1
FOOTNOTES
1. We express no opinion as to whether the parties' actions occurring after the entry of the March 7, 2021 preliminary injunction order satisfy the procedural options of chapter 164.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Nos. 3D21-701, 3D21-761
Decided: October 27, 2021
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)