PRESERVE GROVE ISLE LLC v. GROVE ISLE YACHT TENNIS CLUB LLC (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

PRESERVE GROVE ISLE LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. GROVE ISLE YACHT & TENNIS CLUB, LLC, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D20-1621

Decided: November 06, 2020

After a careful review, the Petition for Writ of Prohibition is hereby denied as legally insufficient. See Jackson v. State, 599 So. 2d 103, 107 (Fla. 1992) (“The fact that a judge has previously made adverse rulings is not an adequate ground for recusal. Nor is the mere fact that a judge has previously heard the evidence a legally sufficient basis for recusal.” (citations omitted)).

GORDO, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network