Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
FLORIDA IMMIGRATION BUILDING FUNDING LLC, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. CHUN LIU, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).
The Petition for Writs of Certiorari and Mandamus is granted in part and denied in part. The trial court should not have conducted the show cause proceedings at issue after the filing of the motion to compel arbitration prior to, at a minimum, first issuing an order staying proceedings “on just terms” as required by statute. See § 682.03(6), Fla. Stat. (“If a party makes a motion to the court to order arbitration, the court on just terms shall stay any judicial proceeding that involves a claim alleged to be subject to the arbitration until the court renders a final decision under this section.”). The trial court was placed on notice of the motion to compel arbitration and chose to conduct proceedings on the discovery issues first, and then stay later. This was procedurally improper and constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of the statute. The trial court also issued an order on November 10, 2020, purporting to discharge the show cause order, after this Court issued a stay of proceedings. Accordingly, all orders entered after the motion to compel arbitration was filed on November 2, 2020, are vacated. The trial court shall stay all proceedings, in their entirety, until such time as it conducts a hearing and issues a ruling on the petitioner's motion to compel arbitration. However, to the extent Petitioner seeks additional relief related to the discovery now produced, the Court finds no irreparable harm in the production of such documents in response to the court's October 27, 2020, order and existing discovery requests. Petition granted in part and denied in part and remanded to trial court for proceedings consistent herewith.
Respondents' Motion for Entitlement of Attorneys' Fees and Costs is hereby denied.
EMAS, C.J., and GORDO and BOKOR, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CASE NO.: 3D20-1629
Decided: November 16, 2020
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)