SATIN v. SATIN (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Eric SATIN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Geri SATIN, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

Case No.: 3D20-1510

Decided: December 03, 2020

After review of the record and careful consideration, the Petition for Writ of Prohibition is hereby denied as legally insufficient.

Upon consideration of Respondent's Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees and Costs, it is ordered that said Motion is conditionally granted, and the matter is remanded to the trial court for a determination pursuant to section 61.16, Florida Statutes, Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997), and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400.

SCALES, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network