COLOMBO v. DACRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Ugo COLOMBO, et al., Appellants, v. DACRA DEVELOPMENT, CORPORATION, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D20-277

Decided: April 07, 2021

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ.

Coffey Burlington, P.L., and Jeffrey B. Crockett; Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., Thomas E. Scott, and Daryl Greenberg, for appellants. Kula & Associates, P.A., Elliot B. Kula and William D. Mueller; Richard and Richard, P.A., and Dennis Richard, for appellees.

Affirmed. See Phillips v. Garcia, 147 So. 3d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (Recognizing that the trial court is in a superior position to determine whether the party or its counsel knew or should have known that the claim or defense asserted was not supported by the facts or the applicable law and concluding that the appellate court will reverse only if the record reflects that no reasonable trial judge could have denied the motion for sanctions under Florida Statute 57.105.).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network