PEREZ v. PEREZ (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Adolfo PEREZ Sr., et al., Appellants, v. Adolfo PEREZ Jr., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D20-1352

Decided: March 03, 2021

Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and GORDO, JJ.

Weissman & Dervishi, P.A., and Peter A. Tappert, for appellants. Choi & Menezes, LLP, and IL Young Choi, for appellees.

Affirmed. See Abramson v. Brant, 141 So. 2d 777, 778 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962) (“[T]he court making the appointment [of a receiver] may, at its discretion, during the pendency of the action make such further orders as are necessary and proper for the protection of the property and interests concerned.”); Puma Enters. Corp. v. Vitale, 566 So. 2d 1343, 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (affirming, under an abuse of discretion standard, the trial court's ex parte order expanding the scope of an existing receivership to include an assignee of assets subject to the initial receivership).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network