HOWARD v. STATE (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Ron Christopher HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D20-992

Decided: February 10, 2021

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, Megan Lynne Long, Assistant Public Defender, Kasey Lacey, Assistant Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Adam B. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, and Benjamin L. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Affirmed. See Owens v. State, 303 So. 3d 993, 994–95 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (holding that regardless of whether section 948.06(2) applies to a defendant who committed an offense before the statute was amended, when imposing sentence for a violation of probation, a trial court is limited under section 948.06(2)(f)1. to modifying or continuing probation or imposing a sentence of up to 90 days in county jail only when a defendant “compl[ies] with all four conditions in section 948.06(2)(f)1”).

Per Curiam.

B.L. Thomas, Winokur, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network