WASHINGTON v. STATE (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Khalil Maximilian WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-2794

Decided: January 20, 2021

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Affirmed. See St. Louis v. State, 985 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Armstrong v. State, No. 1D20-498, 312 So.3d 138, 140 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 19, 2020) (explaining that the trial court did not violate a defendant's Sixth Amendment rights in departing from the statutory maximum sentence, because section 775.084, Florida Statutes, authorized the court to impose an enhanced sentence on the basis of the defendant's prior felony convictions, and not based on findings of fact).

PER CURIAM.

WARNER, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network