Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Victor R. JUBRAN, Appellant, v. SOUTH LANE DISTRIBUTION CENTER, LLC, Appellee.
Appellant, Victor R. Jubran, appeals an order granting final summary judgment in favor of Appellee, South Lane Distribution Center, LLC. Appellant, who alleged below that Appellee was negligent in the handling of its fencing in which he was injured and that Appellee failed to warn of the fence's dangers, argues that issues of material fact remain that preclude summary judgment. We agree that disputed material facts remain as to whether there was a fence on the border of Appellee's property at some point in time and whether Appellee was responsible for taking it down and leaving a portion of it on the ground where Appellant fell. Accordingly, we reverse the order granting summary judgment and remand for further proceedings. See Pickford v. Taylor Cnty. Sch. Dist., 298 So. 3d 707, 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (noting that an appellate court reviews a trial court's grant of summary judgment under the de novo standard of review to ascertain whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and that the court must view the evidence and draw all inferences in the light most favorable to the non-moving party); see also Williams v. Davis, 974 So. 2d 1052, 1060 (Fla. 2007) (explaining that numerous Florida cases have held that landowners were “responsible under a standard of reasonable care for conditions emanating from their property that were determined to constitute a danger and hazard to others”).
Reversed and Remanded for further proceedings.
Per Curiam.
Lewis, Tanenbaum, and Long, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D20-238
Decided: January 14, 2021
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)