FOX v. CITY OF AVENTURA (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Daniel FOX, etc., et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF AVENTURA, et al., Appellees.

Nos. 3D19-1977, 3D19-1976, 3D19-1975

Decided: January 06, 2021

Before EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, and MILLER, JJ.

Schuler, Halvorson, Weisser, Zoeller & Overbeck, P.A., Jason D. Weisser, and David M. Kerner (West Palm Beach); Harris Appeals, P.A., and Andrew A. Harris (Palm Beach Gardens), for appellants. Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., E. Bruce Johnson, and Christopher J. Stearns (Ft. Lauderdale); Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., Edward G. Guedes and Samuel I. Zeskind, for appellees.

Affirmed. See Roth v. Cohen, 941 So. 2d 496, 500 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“For an issue to be preserved for appeal, ․ it ‘must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.’ ” (quoting Archer v. State, 613 So. 2d 446, 448 (Fla. 1993))).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network