Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MICHAEL LANE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
AFFIRMED. See Scipio v. State, 928 So. 2d 1138, 1150 (Fla. 2006) (holding that any Richardson violation is harmless where no reasonable probability exists that the defense was materially hindered in its trial preparation or strategy because of the discovery violation) (citing State v. Schopp, 653 So. 2d 1016, 1020–21 (Fla. 1995)).
PER CURIAM.
RAY, OSTERHAUS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D21-3751
Decided: December 21, 2022
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)