PIMIENTA v. ROSENFELD (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Michelle PIMIENTA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. David ROSENFELD, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D20-0539

Decided: July 02, 2020

Following review of the pro se Petition for Writ of Prohibition, and the Response and Reply thereto, it is ordered that said Petition is hereby denied.

Upon consideration of the respondent's Motion for Award of Appellate Attorney's Fees, it is ordered that said Motion is conditionally granted, and the matter is remanded to the trial court for hearing pursuant to section 61.16, Florida Statutes, and Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997).

EMAS, C.J., and GORDO and LOBREE, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network