TUOZA v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oscar TUOZA, et al., Appellants, v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 3D20-1373

Decided: December 02, 2020

Before FERNANDEZ, HENDON and LOBREE, JJ.

Shield Law Group of Florida, LLC, and Jamie Alvarez (Davie), for appellants. Paul R. Pearcy, P.A., and Maureen G. Pearcy, for appellee.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

We grant appellee's motion and dismiss this appeal without prejudice as one taken from a non-final, non-appealable order. See Cicco v. Luckett Tobaccos, Inc., 934 So. 2d 560, 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“We have long adhered to the rule that piecemeal appeals will not be permitted where claims are interrelated and involve the same transaction and the same parties remain in the suit.”); S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla. 1974) (“Generally, the test employed by the appellate court to determine finality of an order, judgment or decree is whether the order in question constitutes an end to the judicial labor in the cause, and nothing further remains to be done by the court to effectuate a termination of the cause as between the parties directly affected.”).

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network