Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
VME GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. The GRAND CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., etc., et al., Respondents.
VME Group International, LLC files a petition for writ of prohibition, seeking review of the trial court's order denying VME's motion for disqualification of the trial judge.
The petition is based upon documented activity occurring in August of 2018. The motion to disqualify was filed in September of 2020. Neither the motion nor its attachments contain any averment or allegation regarding when these facts were discovered, nor any averment or allegation (save for a conclusory statement) that the motion was filed in a timely manner. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(e) (providing: “A motion to disqualify shall be filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion ․”). See State v. Oliu, 183 So. 3d 1161, 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (stating: “While these allegations give rise to an objectively reasonable fear of bias or prejudice requiring disqualification of the trial judge, we are compelled to deny the petition for writ of prohibition because the motion to disqualify the trial judge was not timely filed.”)
Although we are compelled to deny the petition, we note that the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration permit a judge to enter an order of disqualification on her own initiative. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(i) (providing: “Judge's Initiative. Nothing in this rule limits the judge's authority to enter an order of disqualification on the judge's own initiative”); Oliu, 183 So. 3d at 1163.
Petition denied.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D20-1622
Decided: December 02, 2020
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)