BOTELL v. STATE (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Armando BOTELL, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D20-0186

Decided: June 25, 2020

Because the appellant failed to serve the proper party below, the order under review is affirmed without prejudice to Appellant naming and serving the Miami-Dade Police Department as the seizing agency in possession. See, e.g., § 705.105(1), Fla. Stat. (2015); Bonilla v. Miami-Dade Police Dep't, 41 So. 3d 1058, 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

LOGUE, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network