PUENTE v. TOWER HILL SIGNATURE INSURANCE COMPANY (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

David PUENTE and Maria C. Puente, Appellants, v. TOWER HILL SIGNATURE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 3D19-1374

Decided: October 28, 2020

Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ.

The Nation Law Firm, and Mark A. Nation, and Paul W. Pritchard (Longwood), for appellants. Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP, and Scot E. Samis (St. Petersburg), for appellee.

Affirmed. See Whitman v. Castlewood Int'l Corp., 383 So. 2d 618, 619 (Fla. 1980) (“[W]here there is no proper objection to the use of a general verdict, reversal is improper where no error is found as to one of two issues submitted to the jury on the basis that the appellant is unable to establish that he has been prejudiced.”) (citation omitted); see also State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Lichtman, 227 So. 2d 309, 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969) (“[W]hether a certain set of facts exist to bring a loss to the insured within the terms of a policy is an issue to be determined by the trier of fact.”) (citations omitted).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network