MH NATIONAL INC v. AMERIJO INVESTMENT INC (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MH NATIONAL INC., Appellant, v. AMERIJO INVESTMENT, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D19-2003

Decided: October 07, 2020

Before FERNANDEZ, HENDON and GORDO, JJ.

Shlomo Y. Hecht, P.A., and Shlomo Y. Hecht (Miramar), for appellant. Daniel Y. Gielchinsky, P.A., and Daniel Y. Gielchinsky, for appellee Jerrell Andrew Breslin.

Affirmed. Nieburg v. Sulzberger, 260 So. 3d 363, 364 (Fla 3d DCA 2018) (stating that an attorney is liable for his or her negligence in the performance of professional duties only where there is privity of contract or where the party asserting the claim was the intended third-party beneficiary of the attorney's services); Arlington Pebble Creek, LLC v. Campus Edge Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 232 So. 3d 502, 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (setting forth the elements required to establish a negligent misrepresentation claim).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network