GIDWANI v. ROBERTS (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Suresh GIDWANI and Bina Gidwani, Appellants, v. Sherry ROBERTS, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D19-1442

Decided: August 05, 2020

Before LOGUE, HENDON and LOBREE, JJ.

Easley Appellate Practice PLLC, and Dorothy F. Easley, for appellants. Vincent F. Vaccarella, P.A., and John A. Moore and Peter L. Meltzer (Fort Lauderdale), for appellees.

Affirmed. See Murphy v. Murphy, 370 So. 2d 403, 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (“In order to overcome the trial court's findings upon a sufficiency of the evidence point, it is necessary for an appellant to go beyond merely showing that the more reasonable view of the evidence, in his opinion, supports a contrary finding.”); see also Plana v. Sainz, 990 So. 2d 554, 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding alleged error in no damages award waived); Coconut Key Homeowner's Ass'n, Inc. v. Gonzalez, 246 So. 3d 428, 433 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (deeming party entitled to fees under section 720.305(1), worded similarly to 718.303(1), despite “no damages” award), receded from on other grounds by Sherman v. Sherman, 279 So. 3d 188 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network