Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Stanley Ray COOKSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Stanley Cookston was convicted, after a jury trial, of armed burglary of a dwelling. On appeal, he argues that the trial court committed fundamental error when it failed to hold a competency hearing and enter a competency order. We agree.
Prior to trial, defense counsel moved for a competency determination pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210(b). The trial court granted the motion and appointed an expert to examine Cookston to determine if he was competent to proceed. Defense counsel subsequently “stipulated” that his client was competent to proceed. However, the record does not indicate that any competency hearing was held, nor does the record contain an order adjudicating competency.
If a trial court appoints an expert to determine a defendant's competency to proceed, it must thereafter make an independent determination of the defendant's competency. Dougherty v. State, 149 So. 3d 672, 679 (Fla. 2014). Failure to do so constitutes fundamental error. Alexander v. State, 254 So. 3d 1157, 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018). Furthermore, a trial court may not simply accept defense counsel's stipulation that his client is competent to proceed. Dougherty, 149 So. 3d at 678 (“However, nothing in our precedent or the State's argument persuades us that a defendant can stipulate to the ultimate issue of competency, even where the written reports reach the same conclusion.”).
We reverse and remand for the trial court to determine whether it can conduct a hearing to determine Cookston's competency at the time of trial. See Parcilla v. State, 257 So. 3d 156, 157 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018). If it is possible to hold such hearing, and the court determines that Cookston was competent, then it shall enter a nunc pro tunc written order adjudicating him competent. Id. If the court determines that Cookston was incompetent, or if the court is unable to conduct a hearing, it shall vacate Cookston's judgment and sentence and conduct further proceedings. Id.
REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.
PER CURIAM.
EVANDER, C.J., LAMBERT and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Case No. 5D19-2523
Decided: July 10, 2020
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)