Maria Victoria Castro, Appellant, v. Luz Marina Castro, Appellee. (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Maria Victoria Castro, Appellant, v. Luz Marina Castro, Appellee.

Nos. 3D21-2235, 3D21-2236

Decided: November 30, 2022

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

Ellis Law Group, P.L., and Jordan R. Hammer (Boca Raton), for appellant. Golden Glasko & Associates, P.A., and William H. Glasko, for appellee.

Affirmed. Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007) (“When opposing parties tell two different stories, one of which is blatantly contradicted by the record, so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a motion for summary judgment.”) see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247–48 (1986) (“[T]he mere existence of some alleged factual dispute between the parties will not defeat an otherwise properly supported motion for summary judgment; the requirement is that there be no genuine issue of material fact.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network