Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Marhlau BELIZAIRE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Marhlau Belizaire appeals the trial court's order striking his petition for writ of mandamus, which was filed in the trial court. He argues that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to strike a petition filed before this Court. The trial court struck the petition filed before it because it was legally insufficient to support the relief sought, and we discern no error in the trial court's order. As such, we affirm the order.
We write briefly, however, because despite Belizaire's arguments in his initial brief that the petition was filed before this Court, this Court has no record of any such filing. Our ruling is without prejudice to Belizaire filing a proper petition before this Court.
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D19-1166
Decided: April 08, 2020
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)