OLIVA HOME CORP v. HSBC BANK USA (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OLIVA'S HOME CORP., Appellant, v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A., Appellee.

No. 3D19-1761

Decided: April 08, 2020

Before SALTER, LOGUE and GORDO, JJ.

Florida General Counsel, P.A., and Hugo L. Garcia, for appellant. Aldridge | Pite, LLP, and Jonathan Jacobson, Zachary Ullman and Jennifer Travieso (Delray Beach), for appellee.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979); Haddad v. Khan, 54 So. 3d 524, 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (“In the absence of an adequate transcript on appeal, a judgment that is not fundamentally erroneous must be affirmed.”); Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So. 2d 671, 672-73 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (same); Harrod v. Union Fin. Co., 420 So. 2d 108, 109 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (“[T]he rule precluding intervention in a mortgage foreclosure action by a person who acquires an interest in the subject property after the recording of a lis pendens ․ is equally applicable where the prospective intervenor's interest, although acquired beforehand, is not recorded until after the recording of the lis pendens.” (citing Andresix Corp. v. Peoples Downtown Nat. Bank, 419 So. 2d 1107, 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982))).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network